Inside Ukraine’s Battlefield Innovation Loop
This exclusive Cogs of War interview is with Catarina Buchatskiy, the co-founder and director of analytics at the Snake Island Institute , a Kyiv-based defense analytics center, and Viktoriia Honcharu
ManyPress Editorial Team
ManyPress Editorial

This exclusive Cogs of War interview is with Catarina Buchatskiy, the co-founder and director of analytics at the Snake Island Institute , a Kyiv-based defense analytics center, and Viktoriia Honcharuk, the institute’s director of defense technologies. We asked them to share their views on how Ukraine’s military and defense firms turn battlefield feedback into rapid innovation, what Western investors and defense tech companies can learn from Ukraine, and what a future Ukraine-West defense indust
Why are these companies so hesitant — and why should venture-backed defense companies test more in Ukraine? In Ukraine, the end user’s requirements drive innovation, and any technology that reaches the battlefield is evaluated immediately under harsh conditions. In the Western world, on the other hand, the private market often dictates the direction of innovation. This means that a lot of Western technology can be far from emergent battlefield needs. It also means that certain technologies can’t keep up with the pace of change. Because of this, many technologies coming from abroad are not suited for use in Ukraine. It’s possible that some companies understand this and are hesitant to test in Ukraine because failure on the battlefield is very visible , especially while those companies continue selling in Western markets. “Tested in Ukraine” can mean a million different things, and there’s a risk that it has become a vague marketing label that encompasses a wide range of behaviors. On one end are systems deployed with frontline units across multiple rotations, iterated through operator feedback, and refined until they survive a Russian electronic warfare envelope. On the other end are companies that flew their drone once in a field outside Lviv and took a photo with a Ukrainian officer. Since failure is often a step on the way to a truly effective product, however, those companies focused on true effectiveness should really be testing in Ukraine. This might be the first war in which a soldier can text a manufacturer over WhatsApp about problems with the latter’s product.
Key points
- Why are these companies so hesitant — and why should venture-backed defense companies test more in Ukraine?
- In Ukraine, the end user’s requirements drive innovation, and any technology that reaches the battlefield is evaluated immediately under harsh conditions.
- In the Western world, on the other hand, the private market often dictates the direction of innovation.
- This means that a lot of Western technology can be far from emergent battlefield needs.
- It also means that certain technologies can’t keep up with the pace of change.
This article was independently rewritten by ManyPress editorial AI from reporting originally published by War on the Rocks.



