A new study suggests that traditional rain-making rituals appear successful in specific regions due to local climate patterns where the probability of rain increases after dry spells. This mechanism helps explain the persistence of such beliefs and practices.

Key facts
- •Economist José-Antonio Espín-Sánchez explains the apparent success of rain-making rituals through climate patterns.
- •In places like Murcia, Spain, the chance of rain increases with each consecutive dry day.
- •A study compared customs of 1290 ethnic groups with their climate data.
- •44% of groups with increasing rain probability had rituals, compared to 30% of groups without.
- •A mathematical model shows how trust in rituals and leaders is influenced by perceived success.
- •Priests who time rituals before rain returns are more likely to keep their jobs and ensure the ritual's survival.
Economist José-Antonio Espín-Sánchez at Yale University proposes that traditional 'rain-making' rituals, observed in places like China around AD 1000 and Murcia, Spain, for seven centuries, appear effective due to specific regional climate patterns. His research indicates that in these areas, the likelihood of precipitation increases with each dry day. This natural pattern makes it seem as though rituals successfully bring rain shortly after they are performed.
By the numbers
Climate Patterns and Perceived Success
In regions such as Murcia, Spain, and historical China, the crucial difference is that the probability of precipitation becomes higher with every day that passes without rain. Consequently, if a religious leader initiates a ritual during a prolonged dry spell, there is a significant chance that the weather will change soon after. If the initial ritual does not immediately result in rain, a follow-up ritual days or weeks later has an even greater likelihood of coinciding with the return of precipitation, reinforcing the perception of its effectiveness.
Research Findings and Mechanisms
Espín-Sánchez and his colleagues analyzed customs from 1290 ethnic groups alongside detailed climate data from their locations. They found that among groups living in areas where the chance of rain does not increase after dry days, 30 percent had a rain-making ritual. In contrast, for groups where the probability of rain does increase, 44 percent practiced such rituals. Simon Papalexiou at Hamburg University of Technology noted that this statistical plausibility can arise from two mechanisms: true duration dependence, where longer dry spells are more likely to end, or seasonal anticipation, where rituals are timed near the end of a dry season when rain is naturally more likely.
Model of Belief and Ritual Survival
Espín-Sánchez developed a mathematical model to describe how people adjust their trust in rituals and religious leaders based on observed outcomes. This model accounts for both the strategic timing of rituals by priests and pure chance. He suggests that priests who choose to perform rituals shortly before the rains return are more likely to maintain their positions, and the specific religion or ritual itself is more likely to endure. Kevin Hong at the University of Macau, who studied rain-making in China, acknowledged that Espín-Sánchez’s results might indicate an objective effectiveness of these rituals, potentially underestimating this aspect in his own work which focused on confirmation bias.
Advertisement
This article was independently rewritten by ManyPress editorial AI from reporting originally published by New Scientist.



