The House approved a nonbinding resolution to end the Iran war, while the Senate rejected a separate measure that would have carried the force of law.

Key facts
- •The House resolution passed 214-208, while the Senate measure failed 47-49.
- •Four Republicans voted with Democrats in the House to support the nonbinding resolution.
- •Sen. Susan Collins was the only Republican to vote in favor of the Senate's binding resolution.
- •Rep. Gregory Meeks intends to introduce a resolution to sue the administration in five weeks.
- •Public opposition to the war is cited at 70% by Rep. Gregory Meeks.
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 214-208 on Thursday to approve a Democratic-led, nonbinding resolution directing President Donald Trump to remove armed forces from hostilities in Iran. Later that day, the Senate rejected a separate joint resolution to end the war in a 47-49 vote. The legislative efforts come as Democrats seek to reassert Congress's role in declaring war and force Republicans to take a public stance on the conflict ahead of midterm elections.
By the numbers
House and Senate Legislative Actions
Four Republicans—Thomas Massie, Tom Barrett, Warren Davidson, and Brian Fitzpatrick—joined all Democrats in the House to pass the nonbinding measure. In the Senate, Republican Susan Collins joined all Democrats except John Fetterman to support the resolution that would have carried the force of law, though it remained short of the votes needed to pass.
Political Context and Future Strategy
Democrats are utilizing these votes to highlight public opposition to the war, citing data that 70% of Americans oppose the conflict. Rep. Gregory Meeks stated that Democrats may use the 'power of the purse' during upcoming government funding negotiations to force an end to the war. Meeks also plans to introduce a resolution to sue the administration when the House returns from recess.
Republican Perspectives on the Conflict
Some Republicans, including Sens. Thom Tillis and John Curtis, have argued the war should not exceed 60 days without congressional approval, though both voted against the Senate measure. Tillis suggested that the 60-day clock began in July, not when strikes first launched in February. Meanwhile, Rep. Rob Bresnahan emphasized the need for a quick resolution to stabilize fuel and fertilizer prices, while maintaining that Iran must not possess nuclear weapons.
Advertisement
This article was independently rewritten by ManyPress editorial AI from reporting originally published by NBC Politics.



